<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Frontier on r-econometrics</title>
		<link>https://www.r-econometrics.com/tags/frontier/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Frontier on r-econometrics</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.r-econometrics.com/tags/frontier/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Reproduction: Coelli, T. J. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1.</title>
				<link>https://www.r-econometrics.com/reproduction/1996_coelli_frontier41/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.r-econometrics.com/reproduction/1996_coelli_frontier41/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;For most of the 1990s and 2000s, estimating a stochastic frontier meant running FRONTIER 4.1, Tim Coelli’s Fortran program, and its guide (Coelli, 1996) was where one learnt how. The guide works through a small example: a Cobb-Douglas production frontier for 60 firms with half-normal inefficiency, estimated by maximum likelihood. Its data are distributed with the program and, today, with the R package &lt;a href=&#34;https://cran.r-project.org/package=frontier&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;frontier&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; by Coelli and Henningsen, which implements FRONTIER 4.1 in R.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post reproduces that example twice: by maximum likelihood with &lt;code&gt;frontier&lt;/code&gt;, which returns the guide’s printed estimates, and by Bayesian inference with &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/franzmohr/bsfa&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;bsfa&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. The second is the more interesting exercise, because the two approaches answer slightly different questions, and a sample of 60 is small enough for the difference to show.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
